Life in New York City includes
being on frequent scouting missions for public restrooms. Most subway stations
did have some at one time, but those are now closed or off limits to actual
paying passengers. If you live and have a social life in New York City, you
will also likely become adept at public urination at a certain level.
Clean public restrooms are a
sought-after commodity for people in the city. There are even mobile
applications for smart phones that help people find the nearest public
restroom. This phenomenon is not exclusive to New York, of course, but like
everything else, it is more of an intense challenge here. There are too many
people vying for comfort and ease in our Gotham, and breakneck competition for
the good life means someone has to lose.
Starbucks was the subject of
good-guy America’s two-minute hate a few months back when two African American
men were arrested a Philadelphia location after using the bathroom and refusing
to order anything. The Seattle-based coffee chain closed 8,000 of its stores in
the U.S. this past Tuesday for “a conversation and learning session on race,
bias and building of a diverse welcoming company.” One note: while it closed
all of its “company operated” stores, its 7,000 “licensed stores” at airports,
hotels, major grocery stores, and universities, remained open.
Maybe the whole mess could have
been avoided if some of the people who objected to the arrests had bought the
two men some coffee, but apparently the fight for justice is worth shooting
video with your smart phone but isn’t worth springing for an $8 latte.
Outrage quickly spread and there
were calls for boycotts of the ubiquitous coffee chain. I was way ahead of the curve before it became
uncool to get coffee there. Starbucks injects unneeded pretention into buying
coffee. I refuse to use its bogus jargon that calls a small coffee a “tall.”
Just let me order a large coffee (which I never see on their menu; you have to
know to order the “coffee of the day” if you want to get anything resembling a
regular cup of coffee—please spare me that nonsense). I prefer to drink the
free coffee they have at the office where I work. If I’m going to get coffee
from a store, I’ll go to 7 Eleven or to any local corner deli or bodega, which
usually have decent coffee and will be happy to take your money without putting
on airs.
Just about everyone agrees that
arresting people for loitering in a coffee shop is excessive. If police
arrested everyone who went into a Starbucks just to use the bathroom there
would be more Americans in jail than out of jail.
Starbucks’ continuing mea culpa
included a public announcement that anyone
can use any Starbucks bathroom at any time without making a purchase.
That’s both good and bad news. The
good news is: If you are starting to get desperate for a restroom you know you
can walk into a Starbucks and stand on the (now likely longer) line to access a
legal toilet. The bad news is: Now everyone knows that. The company is going
out of its way to welcome people who are not customers. When people can’t be
turned away, the kind of people who show up are people who would normally get
turned away.
This will make everything more
crowded, and will also bring in more homeless people. This will get worse in
the winter time, and if homeless people can’t be dissuaded from camping out
there, customers will start turning away.
A few months ago, I met a friend
for coffee at Grand Central Terminal, where they have tables and several coffee
shops. The MTA has let the homeless problem at Grand Central get out of hand
again, and while I was able to find a place to sit and have coffee with a
friend, the presence of the homeless was everywhere.
Another issue that arises with
unlimited bathroom access is that of drugs. We are in the midst of a drug use
crisis that few have seen in their lifetimes involving opiates. Will Starbucks
be the new injection site for addicts? The bathroom lines will be even longer
when more people start overdosing in them.
One issue that’s become lost in
this discussion is the welfare of Starbucks employees. Their jobs are tough
enough, especially in light of this recent publicity, and they now have to
clean up after a bigger swath of the general public, including more homeless
and drug addicts. All official hand-washing aside, do you want someone who just
cleaned a horrendous restroom to be handling your iced coffee and banana bread?
Me neither.
If Starbucks becomes an overcrowded
mess as America’s new homeless shelter or heroin shooting gallery, it will no
longer be America’s preferred “third place.” Why shouldn’t people bring a
bagged lunch when they visit the city and take advantage of the space,
bathrooms, and free Wi-Fi at Starbuck’s? So what is the plan to counter the potential
deluge of homeless and drug addicts?
I wish the chain the best of luck
in navigating this. I will add them to my own mental list of available public
restrooms, but only to be sought in desperate times, and I’ll try to buy
something.